The Genocidal Potential Of Australias New Booster Policies
The new, potentionally very dangerous booster policy by WEF reviewer Professor Halton was accepted by the government
While these articles are playing out in Australia, the principles will concern all countries under WEF influence. Similar interferences will very likely happen in many other countries.
This is part two of three about Australia’s new booster policy for 2023/2024. As more I research this topic as deeper the rabbit hole goes. One planned article turned into two and then three parts.
This is deliberately written with less informed people in mind who still make up the bulk in the Covid opinion war. To win this war we need to convince them. They will reject too radically and outlandishly worded articles. I hope these articles are sharable with people sitting on the fence.
Part one proves the infiltration and direct influence of the WEF on the Australian domestic booster program through reviewer Professor Halton.
This part (2) explores the bigger context in which Professor Halton’s recommendations are happening and what that means for Australians.
Part 1 Summary
In July 2022, Labor Health Minister Butler appoints Professor Halton to review Australia’s secret Covid vaccine procurements, in order to provide “advice about existing vaccine deals and arrangements and if there need to be any changes”
This is in the context of “only” 5.6 million 4th booster shots taken by Australians, a drop of approx. 75% from the 1st shot.
Instead of reviewing it internally (by a body or person directly accountable to the Australian public), he wants somebody “independent”.
Halton, currently, has no role or function in the Australian government at all, but
is the chair of CEPI
CEPI is under the direct command of Bill Gates and the WEF
Australia has no involvement in CEPI at all
CEPI’s mission is “to accelerate the development of vaccines”
CEPI and the Bill Gates Foundation have heavily invested in vaccine-producing companies and are not transparent and accountable to the Australian public
Conflict of interest pointed out to Minister Butler for appointing Halton was denied by Butler. He described Halton as “independent”.
The Australian Health Minister is therefore directly advised by a top WEF operator.
Full article here:
Rapidly dwindling booster uptake in Australia
Many ordinary Australians, even those that willingly took two or three shots, didn’t take the 4th shot. That number dropped dramatically to 5.6 Million. That is an almost 75% decline from the first shot taken by a staggering 20.1 Million Australians resulting in an initial 97.6% uptake by the 16+ population. (Source: health.gov.au)
This was acknowledged by reviewer Professor Halton.
On Page 3 of the report that was released on 28/02/2023:
[…]following early success with managing the pandemic, the uptake of COVID-19 boosters has waned. Unsurprisingly, after living with the virus threat since early 2020, Australians are increasingly fatigued by COVID-19 and disengaged from related news and information.
She solely allocated the 75% decline from 1st shot to the 4th booster shot to “Covid fatigue” and disengagement from “news and information,”
Ignoring the real reasons for vaccine hesitancy
She does not acknowledge the many other factors that contributed to the sharp decline and growing injection hesitance amongst previously stern pro-vax people, such as:
the booster is perceived as unsafe
bad side effects from previous shots (Publicly admitted for the 1st time by the German health minister https://substack.com/inbox/post/108235681)
getting infected with Covid-19 despite being vaccinated
mistrusting the government’s information
turning to alternative uncensored uncorrupted media for information
vaccine mandates were mostly withdrawn
reports of a growing number of different side effects at surveillance databases worldwide
many published scientific papers regarding vaccine damage and very limited effectiveness.
an unprecedented rise in excess mortality worldwide and especially in Australia correlating strongly with the vaccine roll-out - see this article
feeling there is no threat from Covid-19
feeling the government had misled them with their Covid information in the past three years
making their own informed medical decision again
advised by their doctors to not take it
decreased coercion by employers
less fear-mongering in the mainstream media
Seeing loved ones suffering or dying shortly after being injected
and much more
The above educated common-sense guesses are supported by this Rasmussen Survey.
Nearly half of Americans think COVID-19 vaccines may be to blame for many unexplained deaths, and more than a quarter say someone they know could be among the victims.
All of the above was willfully ignored by Professor Halton. According to her, the massive vote against the vaccine by the core of the pro-vax Australian public - not the so-called “fringe anti-vaxers” - is solely down to “fatigue” and disengagement from “news and information.”
Could it be, that the Australian public woke up to the pro-vax propaganda that was orchestrated worldwide by unelected bodies like WEF, WHO, and CEPI and actively implemented by our elected Australian politicians and the bureaucrats they are supposed to oversee? Or do the WHO and CEPI infiltrated bureaucrats and “independent experts” oversee and control our elected politicians?
Incompetence can also be excluded from Halton’s very narrow assessment of vaccine hesitancy. She was a secretary of the department of health from 2014 to 2016 and had important health positions at the WHO in the past years. She is a very experienced health bureaucrat.
It is incomprehensible that she would not be aware of or consider at least some of these other reasons listed. It is obvious that she omits them on purpose.
This alone would have disqualified any reviewer and government adviser before 2020. It appears that she has an agenda and is far from independent.
The same is true for health minister Butler. To appoint her in the first place and then accept her agenda-driven recommendations unchallenged is remarkable. Could it be that they have the same agenda and the review is just a show? Or could it be that Butler has no say in this? In part three I will elaborate on this by analyzing the language used by Halton.
No official independent risk/benefit analysis has been conducted by the Australian government to independently examine the many reports of vaccine injury and deaths. The same is true for the TGA. Quite the opposite. The TGA was just exposed in suppressing fully verified Australian vaccination deaths.
So what drives an intelligent, highly experienced, and highly decorated public servant like Professor Halton, to blatantly ignore the many other reasons for vaccine hesitancy? Why does she not consider all these valid objections of the Australian people?
Everything happens in a bigger context. Right from the start of the pandemic, some people were saying: This is not about a pandemic, it is not about a virus. There is a hidden bigger agenda behind it.
The context of the Australian vaccination program
Professor Halton is the chair of CEPI. That is no coincidence. Organizations like that have a philosophy. The chair has to align with the philosophy. Her lack of care for people and lack of integrity was exposed in part one. Some of her conflict-of-interest appointments were reported in the media.
Suspicious people accuse the WEF and CEPI of trying to establish a centralized totalitarian world government with no input or control mechanism from ordinary people.
CEPI wants everyone on the planet injected with a secret substance labeled mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. They rationalize that in referring to the recently changed definition of “herd immunity” by WHO. Before Nov 2021 the WHO definition of herd immunity reads
indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.
This reflected both realities in our history. We achieved possibly thousands of herd immunities through a critical mass of previous infections in a population.
Most of the viral outbreaks of the last twenty years that made big headlines around the world actually disappeared by themselves without much interference by humans at all. Herd immunity at work. No vaccines were needed.
Granted, some herd immunities in the past 100 years were through vaccination programs. But never during a pandemic.
In Nov 2021 “previous infection”, meaning natural immunity, was omitted from the WHO definition. It now says that herd immunity
is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.
By omitting a few words from a definition by an unelected body not accountable to the people of the planet another unelected body (CEPI) finds the justification to vaccinate a global population endlessly until herd immunity is achieved. As shown with the flu, some viruses can not be eradicated and therefore herd immunity will never be achieved. Covid-19 is one of them.
We probably can count the unelected appointed decision makers at WHO and CEPI on two hands. Less than ten people decided the vaccination destiny of 8 billion people. And what kept our species alive for millions of years - natural immunity - is simply erased to justify the global vaccination of every citizen. And our elected politicians just rolled over and accept this without a fight.
This is very problematic because it prepares the ground for the forced administration of vaccines to every citizen for every new virus, or mutation of a virus.
For herd immunity to work, a given population needs a critical percentage or threshold population to be vaccinated. If that threshold number isn’t reached by voluntary participation the authorities can then justify forced vaccination in the interest of the “common good”. We all saw the beginning of that with the vaccine mandates in the past two years.
Most people complied in Australia and the country reached an astounding high vaccination rate way above 90%. As predicted by experts, herd immunity wasn’t achieved. So vaccination efforts continued ad absurdum until 75% had enough. Will this stop the government from hassling people to get vaccinated? The short answer is no and explained in detail in part 3.
Some naive people might ask: What is wrong with global forced vaccination? The short answer is “Everything”.
Dependency, costs, and side effects are obvious. The ability to deliberately and secretly add agents for all sorts of manipulations is less obvious to these naive people who still believe that the elites that rule these institutions only have our best interests at heart. Researchers have found very unusual substances in the vaccines.
Even if nefarious reasons are excluded, the financial profits of a long-term widespread vaccination program will be enormous. It is a continuous direct transfer of money from the taxpayer to pharmaceutical companies that will never stop. Just in the past three years, 50 Billion dollars were spent by Australian taxpayers for the Covid response. This will continue now year after year after year. See part three.
And there is more.
These injections, called vaccines, are produced in batches and therefore could be specifically altered to target geographically or demographically if so desired.
It is technically possible to target and inject a range of sub-groups of society with an unknown substance e.g. First Nation people, old people, sick people, disabled people etc.
Just to be clear, I am not alleging at all that this is actually happening right now. It might, it might not. We (which outrageously includes the heads of states of free democratic nations), actually have no way of knowing what these injections contain with each new batch.
The content of these vials is 100% within the power and control of the pharmaceutical industries that produce them. Many of the people who control the pharmaceutical industries are part of the WEF.
Some of the pharma companies, like Pfizer, happen to be among the most criminal companies in history. They were convicted in courts of law for killing hundreds of thousands of people with their products and fined billions of dollars.
This whole colossal worldwide injection program is built on trust. Unexplainably, we trust that the pharma companies and unelected bodies like WHO, WEF, and CEPI have the world’s population’s best interests at heart. It appears that trust is eroding rapidly in Australia and around the world, accelerating vaccine hesitancy.
Some conspiracy theories claim that some of the WEF's most influential people have a depopulation agenda.
WEF Adviser Yuval Harari: ‘We Just Don’t Need the Vast Majority of the Population’ in Today’s World (Source)
Henry Kissinger, former secretary of state under Nixon, is accused of being the architect of a new world order. He is also something like the godfather of the WEF.
These quotes are attributed to him
"The elderly are useless eaters." From his book The Final Days.
"Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries." From a National Security Memo number 200 dated April 24, 1974.
Henry Kissinger was instrumental in creating the WEF.
Once again, we do not know if these current depopulation theories will hold any water. We also must point out that wanting to depopulate the world does not necessarily mean actively killing people.
Promoting birth control, for example, is another way. China has enforced very rigorous population control measures that, while very controversial, didn’t involve killing people.
However, the crucial point in this whole debate is not if a small amount of very bad players in power actually depopulate the world through injections right now. The excess death causes are complicated and not fully researched. That many governments in the world - especially those linked to the WEF - either ignore or downplay them doesn’t quell the depopulation conspiracy rumors. It fans them.
The crucial and extremely concerning point is that unelected powerful civil servants like Professor Halton who do not work for the Australian people but report to their powerful masters at CEPI and the WEF are contracted and paid to put legislative structures into place that could facilitate a global genocide if abused by a tyrant. If not now, it could be done in the future. Her recommendation aims for a long-term continuous injection program to be established and maintained in Australia. On Page 1 of her review, she writes:
Australia is, however, through the ‘emergency’ phase of the pandemic which allows for a shift towards a more sustained and long-term approach to the management of COVID-19 (Bold was added by me)
With no democratic oversight or control, bad players can abuse this established framework to execute a plan to rapidly and massively depopulate the world if wanted. All it needs is a new batch of “vaccine” that includes something that causes a delayed death that can’t be directly linked to the vaccine, like cancer, heart failure, etc.
Some say it is already happening. There seems to be a correlation between vaccination and excess mortality. Even if these accusations are incorrect - the fact that it could be done should alarm any leader left in the world that hasn’t surrendered her/his common sense and instinct to a mass hysteria involving a virus as dangerous as the flu.
These mass vaccination programs, combined with heavy censorship and a total lack of democratic honest evaluation, are a ticking time bomb.
Hitlers and Stalins existed and will always exist. They killed millions of people deliberately because they were psychopathic narcissistic and grandiose tyrants. Imagine if a person, or a group of persons, with that personality type, gets control over this global vaccine program. Auschwitz would be a tiny footnote of history in comparison to the horrors they could unleash on the people of the world.
The holocaust was built on an army of highly efficient brainwashed bureaucrats who stopped thinking for themselves and blindly followed orders
According to a recent podcast with Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson estimated this personality type to be around 3 to 5 %, if I remember it right. If such a personality type is highly intelligent and disciplined, they can make it to the top of any power hierarchy in any organization, especially in a mass formation psychotic environment.
I don’t believe they create the mass formation hypnosis. This is a much bigger social phenomenon. See
, who is the current world expert on these matters. But these tyrants will use and thrive in polarized destabilized societies and rise to the top as Hitler did in the aftermath of WW I and the unstable Weimar Republic.Adolf Hitler was just an ordinary narcissistic psychopath that rose to the top in troubled times and unstable social conditions. Once in power, he couldn’t be controlled anymore.
If we want to safeguard the Australian people from plausible tyranny, we need to read Halton’s review recommendation in this bigger context. I am not alleging that Professor Halton is part of a current depopulation conspiracy. Her motivations and involvements - I don’t know.
She might really believe that these vaccinations are the best for Australia. She might be a very caring person that only wants the best. Media profiles can be deceptive. She might be a pawn, unaware of being part of a bigger game. She might be a “useful idiot” being used by powerful players. She might be simply in it for personal financial gain. Or power. It is fruitless to speculate on her motivations and it is not needed.
The only thing that matters is what she does and the consequences of it.
Part 3 of this series will analyze her accepted recommendations within the context of the above.
Thank you so much! May I say that I aploud your discern in approaching the issue. With most of those beholden to the official narrative the "hard facts" and presenting all that is known now, would imo be a mistake and missing the target.
They have to go through a very complex process. Mind you (IMO, again) had the situation magically changed and not my ABC with the rest of the msm, suddenly started to present the truth, that process would be greatly accelerated, probably with volatile consequences. Personally I believe that most of all, the truth (in no small degree supported by the records of patents taken out in all things "vvvirus" and vaxxxine) will come out. Once again, thank you.
It's hard NOT to be a paranoid conspiracy theorist when you take a good look at what is actually happening!
It's true that the medical/pharmaceutical establishment always resists any suggestion that their products might not be safe - but before 2020, drugs and vaccines were withdrawn once the safety signals became obvious (at a much lower rate that we are seeing with the covid shots).
Combine that with the brutal censorship of any dissenting voices - and any thinking person has to wonder what is going on.
We have more and more evidence of malfeasance now coming to light - but the signs were there right from the beginning.
There are facts, and there is speculation.
Fact: Jane Halton was a participant in Event 201, the pandemic simulation exercise held at John Hopkins in 2019. And Event 201 was primarily concerned NOT with how to optimise health care or hospital capacity - no, it was primarily concerned with how to manage the narrative (which would be focused on "the vaccine"), and in particular, how to silence dissent. (There are publicly released videos still available on their website, for anyone who has the fortitude to watch.)
Fact: Even way back in the beginning of 2020 they were talking about "the vaccine" - even though there had never been an effective vaccine developed for any coronavirus, and the mRNA technology was fraught with problems & had been for years.
At that point there was no vaccine (unless you believe that they had one waiting in the wings, which is a possibility that should not be dismissed, given the time frame) and no valid certainty that a safe and effective vaccine would actually be developed.
Did that matter?
No.
We can discuss whether Jane Halton is just a paid stooge, or what her motives might be (money? power? saving the world?), and we can discuss the motives of all those involved - but that is speculation. We may never know.
But we can be pretty sure that if we don't see where this is heading and do what we can to stop it, then we can expect more & more restrictions on our freedoms.
None of us would have predicted, back in 2019, that the whole world would go into lockdown just months later, with all that entailed.
We need to realise that it is not by any means over - in fact, it could very well happen again, and worse.