Thank you so much! May I say that I aploud your discern in approaching the issue. With most of those beholden to the official narrative the "hard facts" and presenting all that is known now, would imo be a mistake and missing the target.
They have to go through a very complex process. Mind you (IMO, again) had the situation magically changed and not my ABC with the rest of the msm, suddenly started to present the truth, that process would be greatly accelerated, probably with volatile consequences. Personally I believe that most of all, the truth (in no small degree supported by the records of patents taken out in all things "vvvirus" and vaxxxine) will come out. Once again, thank you.
IKR? The ABC was so good at uncovering corruption. I think the ABC is one of the reasons that people submitted so easily - we've trusted "our" ABC for so many decades, and here was Norman Swan (a formerly trusted voice) telling us to submit in a reasonable Scottish voice.
It's hard NOT to be a paranoid conspiracy theorist when you take a good look at what is actually happening!
It's true that the medical/pharmaceutical establishment always resists any suggestion that their products might not be safe - but before 2020, drugs and vaccines were withdrawn once the safety signals became obvious (at a much lower rate that we are seeing with the covid shots).
Combine that with the brutal censorship of any dissenting voices - and any thinking person has to wonder what is going on.
We have more and more evidence of malfeasance now coming to light - but the signs were there right from the beginning.
There are facts, and there is speculation.
Fact: Jane Halton was a participant in Event 201, the pandemic simulation exercise held at John Hopkins in 2019. And Event 201 was primarily concerned NOT with how to optimise health care or hospital capacity - no, it was primarily concerned with how to manage the narrative (which would be focused on "the vaccine"), and in particular, how to silence dissent. (There are publicly released videos still available on their website, for anyone who has the fortitude to watch.)
Fact: Even way back in the beginning of 2020 they were talking about "the vaccine" - even though there had never been an effective vaccine developed for any coronavirus, and the mRNA technology was fraught with problems & had been for years.
At that point there was no vaccine (unless you believe that they had one waiting in the wings, which is a possibility that should not be dismissed, given the time frame) and no valid certainty that a safe and effective vaccine would actually be developed.
Did that matter?
No.
We can discuss whether Jane Halton is just a paid stooge, or what her motives might be (money? power? saving the world?), and we can discuss the motives of all those involved - but that is speculation. We may never know.
But we can be pretty sure that if we don't see where this is heading and do what we can to stop it, then we can expect more & more restrictions on our freedoms.
None of us would have predicted, back in 2019, that the whole world would go into lockdown just months later, with all that entailed.
We need to realise that it is not by any means over - in fact, it could very well happen again, and worse.
China's - and India's depopulation programs - limiting births - did indeed produce deaths, mostly of women and girl-children. This is why India abandoned their policy, and eventually China followed suit.
Why doesn’t she acknowledge these views? Because to do so would be to acknowledge that the vaccines aren’t safe and effective as they claim. Bureaucrats aren’t ready (or probably allowed) to admit that.
Thank you so much! May I say that I aploud your discern in approaching the issue. With most of those beholden to the official narrative the "hard facts" and presenting all that is known now, would imo be a mistake and missing the target.
They have to go through a very complex process. Mind you (IMO, again) had the situation magically changed and not my ABC with the rest of the msm, suddenly started to present the truth, that process would be greatly accelerated, probably with volatile consequences. Personally I believe that most of all, the truth (in no small degree supported by the records of patents taken out in all things "vvvirus" and vaxxxine) will come out. Once again, thank you.
Thank you Marta. You keep me going. ;-)
IKR? The ABC was so good at uncovering corruption. I think the ABC is one of the reasons that people submitted so easily - we've trusted "our" ABC for so many decades, and here was Norman Swan (a formerly trusted voice) telling us to submit in a reasonable Scottish voice.
It's hard NOT to be a paranoid conspiracy theorist when you take a good look at what is actually happening!
It's true that the medical/pharmaceutical establishment always resists any suggestion that their products might not be safe - but before 2020, drugs and vaccines were withdrawn once the safety signals became obvious (at a much lower rate that we are seeing with the covid shots).
Combine that with the brutal censorship of any dissenting voices - and any thinking person has to wonder what is going on.
We have more and more evidence of malfeasance now coming to light - but the signs were there right from the beginning.
There are facts, and there is speculation.
Fact: Jane Halton was a participant in Event 201, the pandemic simulation exercise held at John Hopkins in 2019. And Event 201 was primarily concerned NOT with how to optimise health care or hospital capacity - no, it was primarily concerned with how to manage the narrative (which would be focused on "the vaccine"), and in particular, how to silence dissent. (There are publicly released videos still available on their website, for anyone who has the fortitude to watch.)
Fact: Even way back in the beginning of 2020 they were talking about "the vaccine" - even though there had never been an effective vaccine developed for any coronavirus, and the mRNA technology was fraught with problems & had been for years.
At that point there was no vaccine (unless you believe that they had one waiting in the wings, which is a possibility that should not be dismissed, given the time frame) and no valid certainty that a safe and effective vaccine would actually be developed.
Did that matter?
No.
We can discuss whether Jane Halton is just a paid stooge, or what her motives might be (money? power? saving the world?), and we can discuss the motives of all those involved - but that is speculation. We may never know.
But we can be pretty sure that if we don't see where this is heading and do what we can to stop it, then we can expect more & more restrictions on our freedoms.
None of us would have predicted, back in 2019, that the whole world would go into lockdown just months later, with all that entailed.
We need to realise that it is not by any means over - in fact, it could very well happen again, and worse.
China's - and India's depopulation programs - limiting births - did indeed produce deaths, mostly of women and girl-children. This is why India abandoned their policy, and eventually China followed suit.
Why doesn’t she acknowledge these views? Because to do so would be to acknowledge that the vaccines aren’t safe and effective as they claim. Bureaucrats aren’t ready (or probably allowed) to admit that.