I find it hard to believe that Andrews et al and the TGA and AHPRA only killed tens of thousands Ma Mu. But I think the democide has only just begun. The class switch to IgG4 after jab 3 can be expected to lead to far more mass deaths.
I am worried about that too since Gert Vande Bosche predicted it. They will keep pushing the shots and those who are too weak to fight back and/or brainwashed will get sicker and sicker. And one day we might get a nasty mutation and all hell could break loose.
Agree, we know almost nothing about the true nature of the jabs, and what the longer term implications are. Almost nothing. We have a few possible mechanisms of action (spike damage and autoimmunity, LNP toxicity and biodistribution, mRNA integrity, class switching of antibodies)... but I think this is the tip of the iceberg. We still don’t know for sure exactly what was in the injections. It could be a number of things.
Yes just the tip of the iceberg. It appears that the Americans deliberately inserted into the SARS-CoV-2 virus when they created it, possibly in their bioweapons labs in Ukraine, the HIV sequences that Luc Montagnier said had been deliberately inserted and we don't know what the implications are of that for how the jabs wreck their havoc.
Indeed... and the forced retraction of the Indian scientists who found the same is a red flag. It is obviously going to play a role here. I think this is to facilitate reverse transcription, maybe? We now jnow for a fact this is happening (in vitro, at least) ... but they were playing strong defence on this aspect early on. Too bad Luc died... and Kary Mullis... they would have been a real problem with the narrative from the get-go... coincidence?
Thank you. As an Australian who was the only person to stand up in a large open-plan office in May 2021 and debate a cabal of rabid vaccine fundamentalists about how the death rate at the time was lower than the 2019 annual road tolls, that the vaccines were experimental gene therapies which would fundamentally affect key organs of the body and other facts, I was eventually defeated by the mandates imposed by almost every employer. I lost my career but strengthened my courage.
And now the head of the TGA, funded 96% by Big Pharma and the 'expert' body pushing the vaccines in Australia, is predictably retiring. You can run but you cannot hide.
The personality disorder OCPD, bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features subtype, is attracted to regulatory bodies, professional associations, ethics councils and the public health bureaucracy, as well as to law enforcement, the military and academia, where they tend to dominate and rise to the top. It was Hitler's personality disorder. Imagine if he was pro COVID-19 MRNA jabs and you tried to persuade him he was wrong and to change course. You would get about as you would challenging his deeply held belief that it was an ethical and moral imperative to kill the Jews. The TGA, AHPRA and State Premiers all believed it was an ethical and moral imperative to mandate and mass vaccinate. The end justified the means. OCPD is the most common disorder of serial killers. This is what we are up against.
I agree. The Holocaust was mostly a bureaucratic operation. Too much and too powerful bureaucratism is the cancer of society. Covid times showed people what they are willing to do if they think they can get away with it. That's why we need Nuernberg 2.0. They can't get away with this.
The word bureaucrat is poisoned now. If I remember it right, it was Christopher Luxon , NZ National Party leader, who took offense to the word "bureaucrats" used by Ryan Bridges in an interview at the AM Show and suggested they should be called "civil servants". I will do that if I see the vast majority of them actually serving the public as they are supposed to do. Until then: Bloody bureaucrats.
Yes, you are quite right. After WW2 there was for awhile a lot of interest in studying the authoritarian personality and obedience to authority but over time this interest dissipated and we ended up in the situation we are in today where bureaupathology and psychopathology have been normalise, leading to the widespread censorship of dissenting scientific voices and an inability of leaders to deal with theory or data that doesn't fit their preconceptions.
Unfortunately, OCPD get angry and double down on their mistakes when shown to be wrong. They have severe empathy and perspective-taking deficits and can be quite unscrupulous, even though they may think of themselves as moral and ethical. Their tyrannical and dictatorial tendencies and misuse of power, such as when imposing mandates, are most concerning.
OCPD is often comorbid with psychopathy and the most attractive occupation to psychopaths, according to psychopathy specialist Dr Kevin Dutton, is CEO, with "civil servant" also in the top 10.
Bloody bureaucrats indeed, literally as well as figuratively.
I like your clinical definitions. I am a psychotherapist myself and these frameworks and categorizations when used in a general way, can help to make sense of the behaviors of a certain group. Understanding their core beliefs helps me to find compassion and ways to get through to them. Yes, they bloody annoy me on a daily basis and it feels good to say so. But I also know that I can't just eliminate them or work myself up every day- there is a place for healthy humble bureaucracy and our complex lives and the density of urban living requires some order and management.
NZ, for example, had a very humane, efficient, and friendly bureaucratic culture when I lived there from 1992 to 2018. I think they could teach the world. Not sure if it's still like that now.
Sadly Nuremberg did not achieve much - as we could all witness, history has now repeated itself.
Plus, Amany of the criminals immigrated to the USA where they were employed in key positions. They also inundated South America, the later the second general repatriated Germany.
I agree, not much but it was a start. A baby step. It was an attempt to hold tyrants accountable. The codes were broken in the past years. But, unlike the people before Nuernberg, we had codes to refer to. We had a framework from which we could say: This is not ok. And maybe, just maybe, it held the tyrants back a little more this time.
Australia started to build Covid camps and we heard of them in MSM. That wasn't the case with Nazi concentration camps. And the Covid camps didn't have gas chambers. And no forced labor. When they were opened comparisons were made to concentration camps but dismissed. But it made them self-aware. Yes, we repeated history in principle but we also fought it earlier and Nuernberg contributed to that in my opinion. Let's build on that with Nuernberg 2.0.
Yes that's very true. It was almost hypocritical that it was carried out self-righteously, after Churchill and Bomber Harris had targeted and incinerated civilian cities like Dresden, in acts of deliberate terrorism which were ignored, just as the Americans targeting of civilian cities with atomic weapons of mass destruction in Japan was ignored. Imagine the howls of hypocritical outrage that would come from the Americans if the Russians did that in Ukraine. The Americans went on to commit the atrocities in North Korea that are detailed in North Korea's Museum of American War Atrocities. Then the Americans went on to coomit massacres in Vietnam such as the Mai Lai massacre, before bombing the Serbs with depleted uranium and later butchering up to close to a million civilians in Iraq.
A good summary of the saying: The winner writes the history books. There are always many sides to any story. That's why free speech is so very important. All stories have to be told in order to process and heal, as individuals and as societies. Oppressed stories will often find darker, more violent channels to emerge. And given enough time, they will emerge. You can't hold a balloon underwater forever.
It LOOKS like OCPD. It's actually alcohol and other-drug addiction. Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy--all alcoholics. There are hardly any serial killers or mass murderers who were not psychoactive substance addicts. Hitler--amphetamines. Mao--barbiturates. Stalin--alcoholic. You see, alcoholism causes egomania, which drives them to wield power. And that is why they so often rise to the top. Those who do not successfully wield power over others and, hence, do not inflate their ego, end up late-stage addicts sooner. But for so long as they can successfully inflate their egos they are dangerously functional.
I should have said, it looks like all the dangerous-to-others personality disorders.
A study of recovering alcoholics who had been diagnosed with a PD while practicing addicts showed 70% could no longer be so diagnosed after three months of sobriety. My bet is it's 90%+ after three years, but the study has never been done, perhaps because so few stay sober long enough.
Thanks for this analysis. Well done! You state “Let’s be clear. There was a deadly virus...” How do you know this? Look at every seminal paper claiming to isolate or sequence SARSCov2. Look at the methods. Complete pseudoscience. There 100% was no virus.
I said virus, not Coronavirus, I think. Sy actually talks about what you say in your comment in his analysis. I say virus because I know many people, including myself, who got sick. Assuming the virus theory still holds up in general, I attributed it to "a virus". The PCR tests made everyone believe it was a Coronavirus.
Getting sick is not proof of a 'virus' anymore than it's proof of 'evil spirits'. Either we stay true to science (which means doubting/ testing everything) or we might as well just go along with what the TV says.
The fact is virology does not even qualify as science and it never has. It's not falsifiable. It does not use proper controls. Dr Stefan Lanka (a former virologist) has 'proven' the existence of SARS COV2 using standard virology experiments and protocols. The only difference is that he never added any sample from a sick patient. He has even extracted the SARS COV2 genome from a sample of yeast. These are the control experiments that virologists refuse to perform.
Dr Lanka's control experiments prove ALL so called 'viruses' to be a fraud. 'Viruses' are just cellular debris from stressed or dying cells. They are not the 'cause' of anything. They are an effect only.
Blaming sickness on viruses is the same as blaming drunkenness on vomit. There seems to be a correlation.... it kind of makes sense ..... but the error is getting cause/ effect the wrong way around.
The REAL cause(s) of sickness is far more complex and nuanced than the idiotic 'virus' explanation (poor diet, toxins, environmental stresses, psychological stresses, seasonal changes, trauma, EMF, even sun cycles etc). But the moronic 'virus' explanation suits the agendas of profit and social control. So that's the explanation taught in medical schools.
That's why virology has managed to endure for a century despite not qualifying as science. Now they've overreached big time (arrogance) and the entire virology paradigm is now collapsing.
If you want to understand why virology is not science check out viroliegy.com
I agree. It was "new deadly virus" because we were told so. For all we know (or should've known ?) it was the "old" flu since no means available to reliably tell. Alternatively (imo) given a decade of "fiddling" with bits and pieces of "viruses" it's possible that something nasty, concocted in those labs was released some places to "reinforce the message". "Virus", whether in existence of not, is a fear inducing word these days.
If only my late husband knew all these things. I told him ppl who they had said if the virus probably had other conditions and it was too early to trust the vaccine. So angry and hurt that these ppl willfully and purposefully did this!
Yeah the excess flu deaths in years prior to the 2020 drama season they rolled out was telling. The almost complete disappearance of a flu season in 2020, was it 5 deaths, was a BIG RED flag!
It is horrifying and there is a lot of work ahead of us to really find out what created this perfect storm and where our democratic safeguards failed miserably. I shouldn't talk in the past tense as this is far from over. To me, it feels like a pause between two battles. Braze yourself. But many more people are alert to the dangers now and hopefully call bullshit very early.
I was just on the Dept of Health page and stumbled on the vaccine status data whilst looking for something else. Below is the link to the current report of vax status for the nation. I apologise for the blatant racism in that document because they are now identifying first nations rather than everyone as "Australians" which I find rather repugnant. We "Untermenchen" who refused to "Take one for team Pharma" are less than half a million and my home state makes up fifty percent of the national total.
Has anyone pointed out to op that "From March 2021 until September 2022, a 2 1/2-year period, over 60 million doses of an" is actually 1.5 years and that means that actual death count is not 24k but 40k/year? Just curious...
Oooops. No, no one has - lol. Thank you so much. There were around a thousand views so far and you seem to be the only one with a functioning mathematical brain. It makes the jabs look even worse.
Lockdowns and border closures prevented a pandemic in 2020 after the first case arrived in Melbourne from Wuhan on 19 January 2020 and was quickly diagnosed.
Thank you. Love respectful and reasonable dissenting voices. I haven't read your article, sorry (there are so many and so little time), but I have no problem taking at face value what you say and treating it like truth for a moment. So a few questions came up for me but I start with one: What was the benefit of preventing a pandemic in 2020 and "allowing" it in 2021? Especially considering the high price millions of Australians, who had almost no risk from this virus, were forced to pay.
Since the beginning of humanity, we lived through thousands of pandemics and we seemed to handle them well as a species. I could argue it made us more robust and healthy. Isolated island nations and remotely living tribes were historically often protected from pandemics and they paid the ultimate price when the viruses arrived eventually.
I think the research is convincing that natural immunity outperforms any vaccine. Of course, vulnerable and sick people fall victim to viruses and die. Also, lazy people who don't do the work of preventing illness (aka Being your own doctor :-) ) by attending to and nourishing their immune systems and bodies in general, pay the price of severe frequent sickness through viruses. But I would argue that for the vast majority of Australians, it would have been easier to let the pandemic run in 2020 (as recommended in the pandemic preparedness plan at the time).
I agree it was necessary to lockdown to protect the vulnerable until it became clear to the politicians that no jab in the arm would work. My friend and co-author Dr Ted Steele, leading expert in immunology, has appeared in many videos stating that mucosal immunity could never be produced by jabs. So it was all about control and profit for Big Pharma.
Why was it more important to you to protect the small percentage of vulnerable people (average over 83, and often co-morbidities) from the virus than it was to protect the vast majority of people, including children, from the psychological, social, emotional, and financial damage of closed borders, very harsh lockdowns, and being coerced and mandated to be lab rats in a gigantic clinical trial to find out if the jabs work or not?
Why couldn't we do both as recommended in the pandemic preparedness plan? Protect the vulnerable and leave the rest alone?
I completely disagree. When do we ever isolate the healthy?
You only have to look at the result to see how deleterious that intervention was across the world. I am stunned you would continue to support it as the worse than useless action that it was.
You are entitled to your view. Mine is different. The initial Death rates of Wuhan Covid were very high and were assessed as being as dangerous as Spanish flu. Australia has very strict Quarantine rules for human and animal pathogens. Australia has numerous isolation facilities for infectious diseases. Lockdown was very successful at prevent spread of Covid19 throughout 2020.
"The initial Death rates of Wuhan Covid were very high and were assessed as being as dangerous as Spanish flu."
Yes, they were falling down dead in the streets of China... all pantomime of course, which the West swallowed hook, line and sinker...
Average age of COVID death at the time was higher than mortality with average of 2.5 comorbidities.
"Lockdown was very successful at prevent spread of Covid19 throughout 2020."
At what cost though? our excess deaths now are through the roof. Our children are years behind in schooling / social development and obesity / BMI is up. Inflation is through the roof.
All we did was kick the death rate down the road and enhance it. It's remarkable that you would cling to this belief despite the evidence everywhere that it was the wrong things to do.
Pretty sure I caught it on 17 January 2020 on a flight from Adelaide. I was seated next to two Chinese travellers and one hour into the flight one started coughing non-stop for the next two hours. I was nearly asymptomatic aftereards except for what I thought was reflux and later the feeling that I was drowning. Domeone I came into contact with in the first eeek was admitted to hospital 5 days later with severe unexplained community acquired pneumonia.
Pretty sure I got, if not the first case, one of the first in Australia earlier than 19 January 2020 after being seated for hours next to two Chinese travellers on a plane, one of whom was very sick and coughing over me incessantly for hours.
Same across the ditch in NZ. The government announced there was no 'flu thanks to their amazing border control, while the far smarter alleged "SARS-CoV-2" virus leapt and dodged across the border to cause mayhem (not).
The ONLY mayhem was that inflicted by the power drunk politicians and their tyrannical WEF inspired policies, busily manufacturing "cases" and conflating deaths with/of.
The NZzzz populace, a vast majority of doctors and academe happily went along with the unethical, potentially lethal unpredictable clot-shot pantomime-noir with unknown long term consequences, reinforced by bribed and jackbooted State media, institutions and corporations, while the unvaxxed were persecuted, mandated, lost jobs and income and excluded from usual society. The divisions persist now.
I find it hard to believe that Andrews et al and the TGA and AHPRA only killed tens of thousands Ma Mu. But I think the democide has only just begun. The class switch to IgG4 after jab 3 can be expected to lead to far more mass deaths.
I am worried about that too since Gert Vande Bosche predicted it. They will keep pushing the shots and those who are too weak to fight back and/or brainwashed will get sicker and sicker. And one day we might get a nasty mutation and all hell could break loose.
Agree, we know almost nothing about the true nature of the jabs, and what the longer term implications are. Almost nothing. We have a few possible mechanisms of action (spike damage and autoimmunity, LNP toxicity and biodistribution, mRNA integrity, class switching of antibodies)... but I think this is the tip of the iceberg. We still don’t know for sure exactly what was in the injections. It could be a number of things.
Yes just the tip of the iceberg. It appears that the Americans deliberately inserted into the SARS-CoV-2 virus when they created it, possibly in their bioweapons labs in Ukraine, the HIV sequences that Luc Montagnier said had been deliberately inserted and we don't know what the implications are of that for how the jabs wreck their havoc.
Indeed... and the forced retraction of the Indian scientists who found the same is a red flag. It is obviously going to play a role here. I think this is to facilitate reverse transcription, maybe? We now jnow for a fact this is happening (in vitro, at least) ... but they were playing strong defence on this aspect early on. Too bad Luc died... and Kary Mullis... they would have been a real problem with the narrative from the get-go... coincidence?
Not just in Oz, all over the world. Biggest fraud and crime in human history !!
Thank you. As an Australian who was the only person to stand up in a large open-plan office in May 2021 and debate a cabal of rabid vaccine fundamentalists about how the death rate at the time was lower than the 2019 annual road tolls, that the vaccines were experimental gene therapies which would fundamentally affect key organs of the body and other facts, I was eventually defeated by the mandates imposed by almost every employer. I lost my career but strengthened my courage.
And now the head of the TGA, funded 96% by Big Pharma and the 'expert' body pushing the vaccines in Australia, is predictably retiring. You can run but you cannot hide.
The TGA, AHPRA and State Premiers, Australia's worst Mass Murderers, ever.......
The personality disorder OCPD, bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features subtype, is attracted to regulatory bodies, professional associations, ethics councils and the public health bureaucracy, as well as to law enforcement, the military and academia, where they tend to dominate and rise to the top. It was Hitler's personality disorder. Imagine if he was pro COVID-19 MRNA jabs and you tried to persuade him he was wrong and to change course. You would get about as you would challenging his deeply held belief that it was an ethical and moral imperative to kill the Jews. The TGA, AHPRA and State Premiers all believed it was an ethical and moral imperative to mandate and mass vaccinate. The end justified the means. OCPD is the most common disorder of serial killers. This is what we are up against.
I agree. The Holocaust was mostly a bureaucratic operation. Too much and too powerful bureaucratism is the cancer of society. Covid times showed people what they are willing to do if they think they can get away with it. That's why we need Nuernberg 2.0. They can't get away with this.
The word bureaucrat is poisoned now. If I remember it right, it was Christopher Luxon , NZ National Party leader, who took offense to the word "bureaucrats" used by Ryan Bridges in an interview at the AM Show and suggested they should be called "civil servants". I will do that if I see the vast majority of them actually serving the public as they are supposed to do. Until then: Bloody bureaucrats.
Yes, you are quite right. After WW2 there was for awhile a lot of interest in studying the authoritarian personality and obedience to authority but over time this interest dissipated and we ended up in the situation we are in today where bureaupathology and psychopathology have been normalise, leading to the widespread censorship of dissenting scientific voices and an inability of leaders to deal with theory or data that doesn't fit their preconceptions.
Unfortunately, OCPD get angry and double down on their mistakes when shown to be wrong. They have severe empathy and perspective-taking deficits and can be quite unscrupulous, even though they may think of themselves as moral and ethical. Their tyrannical and dictatorial tendencies and misuse of power, such as when imposing mandates, are most concerning.
OCPD is often comorbid with psychopathy and the most attractive occupation to psychopaths, according to psychopathy specialist Dr Kevin Dutton, is CEO, with "civil servant" also in the top 10.
Bloody bureaucrats indeed, literally as well as figuratively.
Nuremberg 2 can't come soon enough.
I like your clinical definitions. I am a psychotherapist myself and these frameworks and categorizations when used in a general way, can help to make sense of the behaviors of a certain group. Understanding their core beliefs helps me to find compassion and ways to get through to them. Yes, they bloody annoy me on a daily basis and it feels good to say so. But I also know that I can't just eliminate them or work myself up every day- there is a place for healthy humble bureaucracy and our complex lives and the density of urban living requires some order and management.
NZ, for example, had a very humane, efficient, and friendly bureaucratic culture when I lived there from 1992 to 2018. I think they could teach the world. Not sure if it's still like that now.
Sadly Nuremberg did not achieve much - as we could all witness, history has now repeated itself.
Plus, Amany of the criminals immigrated to the USA where they were employed in key positions. They also inundated South America, the later the second general repatriated Germany.
I agree, not much but it was a start. A baby step. It was an attempt to hold tyrants accountable. The codes were broken in the past years. But, unlike the people before Nuernberg, we had codes to refer to. We had a framework from which we could say: This is not ok. And maybe, just maybe, it held the tyrants back a little more this time.
Australia started to build Covid camps and we heard of them in MSM. That wasn't the case with Nazi concentration camps. And the Covid camps didn't have gas chambers. And no forced labor. When they were opened comparisons were made to concentration camps but dismissed. But it made them self-aware. Yes, we repeated history in principle but we also fought it earlier and Nuernberg contributed to that in my opinion. Let's build on that with Nuernberg 2.0.
Yes that's very true. It was almost hypocritical that it was carried out self-righteously, after Churchill and Bomber Harris had targeted and incinerated civilian cities like Dresden, in acts of deliberate terrorism which were ignored, just as the Americans targeting of civilian cities with atomic weapons of mass destruction in Japan was ignored. Imagine the howls of hypocritical outrage that would come from the Americans if the Russians did that in Ukraine. The Americans went on to commit the atrocities in North Korea that are detailed in North Korea's Museum of American War Atrocities. Then the Americans went on to coomit massacres in Vietnam such as the Mai Lai massacre, before bombing the Serbs with depleted uranium and later butchering up to close to a million civilians in Iraq.
A good summary of the saying: The winner writes the history books. There are always many sides to any story. That's why free speech is so very important. All stories have to be told in order to process and heal, as individuals and as societies. Oppressed stories will often find darker, more violent channels to emerge. And given enough time, they will emerge. You can't hold a balloon underwater forever.
It LOOKS like OCPD. It's actually alcohol and other-drug addiction. Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy--all alcoholics. There are hardly any serial killers or mass murderers who were not psychoactive substance addicts. Hitler--amphetamines. Mao--barbiturates. Stalin--alcoholic. You see, alcoholism causes egomania, which drives them to wield power. And that is why they so often rise to the top. Those who do not successfully wield power over others and, hence, do not inflate their ego, end up late-stage addicts sooner. But for so long as they can successfully inflate their egos they are dangerously functional.
I should have said, it looks like all the dangerous-to-others personality disorders.
A study of recovering alcoholics who had been diagnosed with a PD while practicing addicts showed 70% could no longer be so diagnosed after three months of sobriety. My bet is it's 90%+ after three years, but the study has never been done, perhaps because so few stay sober long enough.
Alcohol and other drug misuse or addiction is a very common comorbidity of OCPD.
Thanks for this analysis. Well done! You state “Let’s be clear. There was a deadly virus...” How do you know this? Look at every seminal paper claiming to isolate or sequence SARSCov2. Look at the methods. Complete pseudoscience. There 100% was no virus.
I said virus, not Coronavirus, I think. Sy actually talks about what you say in your comment in his analysis. I say virus because I know many people, including myself, who got sick. Assuming the virus theory still holds up in general, I attributed it to "a virus". The PCR tests made everyone believe it was a Coronavirus.
Getting sick is not proof of a 'virus' anymore than it's proof of 'evil spirits'. Either we stay true to science (which means doubting/ testing everything) or we might as well just go along with what the TV says.
The fact is virology does not even qualify as science and it never has. It's not falsifiable. It does not use proper controls. Dr Stefan Lanka (a former virologist) has 'proven' the existence of SARS COV2 using standard virology experiments and protocols. The only difference is that he never added any sample from a sick patient. He has even extracted the SARS COV2 genome from a sample of yeast. These are the control experiments that virologists refuse to perform.
Dr Lanka's control experiments prove ALL so called 'viruses' to be a fraud. 'Viruses' are just cellular debris from stressed or dying cells. They are not the 'cause' of anything. They are an effect only.
Blaming sickness on viruses is the same as blaming drunkenness on vomit. There seems to be a correlation.... it kind of makes sense ..... but the error is getting cause/ effect the wrong way around.
The REAL cause(s) of sickness is far more complex and nuanced than the idiotic 'virus' explanation (poor diet, toxins, environmental stresses, psychological stresses, seasonal changes, trauma, EMF, even sun cycles etc). But the moronic 'virus' explanation suits the agendas of profit and social control. So that's the explanation taught in medical schools.
That's why virology has managed to endure for a century despite not qualifying as science. Now they've overreached big time (arrogance) and the entire virology paradigm is now collapsing.
If you want to understand why virology is not science check out viroliegy.com
The key is what is a coronavirus in reality.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster
I agree. It was "new deadly virus" because we were told so. For all we know (or should've known ?) it was the "old" flu since no means available to reliably tell. Alternatively (imo) given a decade of "fiddling" with bits and pieces of "viruses" it's possible that something nasty, concocted in those labs was released some places to "reinforce the message". "Virus", whether in existence of not, is a fear inducing word these days.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster
If only my late husband knew all these things. I told him ppl who they had said if the virus probably had other conditions and it was too early to trust the vaccine. So angry and hurt that these ppl willfully and purposefully did this!
PLAN-DEM- I C !!
Instant Pandemic-- Just add sloppy PCR test
Create Fear
Start the real depopulation
Yeah the excess flu deaths in years prior to the 2020 drama season they rolled out was telling. The almost complete disappearance of a flu season in 2020, was it 5 deaths, was a BIG RED flag!
absolutely horrifying, but very well laid-out. TQ for posting this!
It is horrifying and there is a lot of work ahead of us to really find out what created this perfect storm and where our democratic safeguards failed miserably. I shouldn't talk in the past tense as this is far from over. To me, it feels like a pause between two battles. Braze yourself. But many more people are alert to the dangers now and hopefully call bullshit very early.
transparency is a powerful tool! it should inevitably be followed by accountability. and justice.
I was just on the Dept of Health page and stumbled on the vaccine status data whilst looking for something else. Below is the link to the current report of vax status for the nation. I apologise for the blatant racism in that document because they are now identifying first nations rather than everyone as "Australians" which I find rather repugnant. We "Untermenchen" who refused to "Take one for team Pharma" are less than half a million and my home state makes up fifty percent of the national total.
https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/covid-19-vaccination-vaccination-data-12-may-2023?language=en
This backs up Prof Robyn Cosford's recent excellent analysis of ABS 'stats' here: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bqAIv7HChuHq/ (27 mins)
The ABS can be seen in Oct 22 to downgrade 2020 COVID deaths by 800%( at 6 :37)
Has anyone pointed out to op that "From March 2021 until September 2022, a 2 1/2-year period, over 60 million doses of an" is actually 1.5 years and that means that actual death count is not 24k but 40k/year? Just curious...
Oooops. No, no one has - lol. Thank you so much. There were around a thousand views so far and you seem to be the only one with a functioning mathematical brain. It makes the jabs look even worse.
Such an excellent posting, thank you very much!
Lockdowns and border closures prevented a pandemic in 2020 after the first case arrived in Melbourne from Wuhan on 19 January 2020 and was quickly diagnosed.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/first-detected-covid19-case-arrived
The pandemic spread from late 2021 was planned and very deliberate once jab failure was evident.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/australias-plan-to-deliberately-spread
Thank you. Love respectful and reasonable dissenting voices. I haven't read your article, sorry (there are so many and so little time), but I have no problem taking at face value what you say and treating it like truth for a moment. So a few questions came up for me but I start with one: What was the benefit of preventing a pandemic in 2020 and "allowing" it in 2021? Especially considering the high price millions of Australians, who had almost no risk from this virus, were forced to pay.
Since the beginning of humanity, we lived through thousands of pandemics and we seemed to handle them well as a species. I could argue it made us more robust and healthy. Isolated island nations and remotely living tribes were historically often protected from pandemics and they paid the ultimate price when the viruses arrived eventually.
I think the research is convincing that natural immunity outperforms any vaccine. Of course, vulnerable and sick people fall victim to viruses and die. Also, lazy people who don't do the work of preventing illness (aka Being your own doctor :-) ) by attending to and nourishing their immune systems and bodies in general, pay the price of severe frequent sickness through viruses. But I would argue that for the vast majority of Australians, it would have been easier to let the pandemic run in 2020 (as recommended in the pandemic preparedness plan at the time).
I agree it was necessary to lockdown to protect the vulnerable until it became clear to the politicians that no jab in the arm would work. My friend and co-author Dr Ted Steele, leading expert in immunology, has appeared in many videos stating that mucosal immunity could never be produced by jabs. So it was all about control and profit for Big Pharma.
Why was it more important to you to protect the small percentage of vulnerable people (average over 83, and often co-morbidities) from the virus than it was to protect the vast majority of people, including children, from the psychological, social, emotional, and financial damage of closed borders, very harsh lockdowns, and being coerced and mandated to be lab rats in a gigantic clinical trial to find out if the jabs work or not?
Why couldn't we do both as recommended in the pandemic preparedness plan? Protect the vulnerable and leave the rest alone?
Or did I misread you?
"I agree it was necessary to lockdown"
I completely disagree. When do we ever isolate the healthy?
You only have to look at the result to see how deleterious that intervention was across the world. I am stunned you would continue to support it as the worse than useless action that it was.
You are entitled to your view. Mine is different. The initial Death rates of Wuhan Covid were very high and were assessed as being as dangerous as Spanish flu. Australia has very strict Quarantine rules for human and animal pathogens. Australia has numerous isolation facilities for infectious diseases. Lockdown was very successful at prevent spread of Covid19 throughout 2020.
"The initial Death rates of Wuhan Covid were very high and were assessed as being as dangerous as Spanish flu."
Yes, they were falling down dead in the streets of China... all pantomime of course, which the West swallowed hook, line and sinker...
Average age of COVID death at the time was higher than mortality with average of 2.5 comorbidities.
"Lockdown was very successful at prevent spread of Covid19 throughout 2020."
At what cost though? our excess deaths now are through the roof. Our children are years behind in schooling / social development and obesity / BMI is up. Inflation is through the roof.
All we did was kick the death rate down the road and enhance it. It's remarkable that you would cling to this belief despite the evidence everywhere that it was the wrong things to do.
"Australia has very strict Quarantine rules for human and animal pathogens. Australia has numerous isolation facilities for infectious diseases. "
Yes, we isolate / quarantine the sick, not the healthy.
COVID 19 was and is the 'flu rebranded. That was clear early on, 'flu cases plummeted and COVID 19 cases rocketed.
Wuhan deaths caused primarily by atmospheric pollution.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/wuhan-flu
Pretty sure I caught it on 17 January 2020 on a flight from Adelaide. I was seated next to two Chinese travellers and one hour into the flight one started coughing non-stop for the next two hours. I was nearly asymptomatic aftereards except for what I thought was reflux and later the feeling that I was drowning. Domeone I came into contact with in the first eeek was admitted to hospital 5 days later with severe unexplained community acquired pneumonia.
Pretty sure I got, if not the first case, one of the first in Australia earlier than 19 January 2020 after being seated for hours next to two Chinese travellers on a plane, one of whom was very sick and coughing over me incessantly for hours.
If I may, respectfully: how was it diagnosed with no effective and reliable diagnostic implements?
It was identified, imaged, fully sequenced, cultured and exported, if you read my article.
Yes, I read it but I'm one of those who believe that is not true.
Like a pretty CGI images of said virus presented to us. I have utmost respect for your work, all the same since it's part of finding the truth.
So go to the MJA to read the award winning article.
Thank you
Same across the ditch in NZ. The government announced there was no 'flu thanks to their amazing border control, while the far smarter alleged "SARS-CoV-2" virus leapt and dodged across the border to cause mayhem (not).
The ONLY mayhem was that inflicted by the power drunk politicians and their tyrannical WEF inspired policies, busily manufacturing "cases" and conflating deaths with/of.
The NZzzz populace, a vast majority of doctors and academe happily went along with the unethical, potentially lethal unpredictable clot-shot pantomime-noir with unknown long term consequences, reinforced by bribed and jackbooted State media, institutions and corporations, while the unvaxxed were persecuted, mandated, lost jobs and income and excluded from usual society. The divisions persist now.
Wonderful! Rigorous, balanced, damning.