Statistical Academic Paper Confirms Very High Chance That Booster Shots Are Killing Tens of Thousands of Australians.

The numbers don't lie - but more boosters are pushed onto unaware citizens, and MSM does not publish this life-saving research.

It takes time, but the blatantly obvious slowly gets confirmed and published in scientific papers.

At the beginning of 2024, I did a deep dive into the official stats of the Australian Bureau of Statists (ABS) and, as a result produced this piece a few months later:

This topic is too important to give up on. After all, on average - two passenger planes crashed every week over the past two years in Australia alone - full of boosted people. I am speaking metaphorically.

Australia’s Department of Health is still recommending the killer boosters:

And more Covid shots are on their way (after millions of doses paid by the taxpayer expired and were destroyed)

Suppose this article miraculously escapes the shadow bans and reaches and convinces only one unaware old person, a granddad or grandma, and starts researching this and stops taking it. In that case, it might save a life or avoid the suffering of serious side effects. That is worth two hours of my time.

In the above Substack, I think I did a responsible statistical job, but I also had to admit that I am no expert. I asked statistical experts to look into this and either confirm or refute my amateur conclusions. My hopes were fulfilled

This paper, published last month at the European Society of Medicine, uses advanced statistical methods to confirm the strong correlation between booster vaccinations and excess death in Australia, which many of us have already noticed through common sense and looking at graphs and timelines.

Well, here it is - hard science. It is so “hard” that I won’t pretend to understand any of the advanced methods, tables and graphs used. But I do understand the abstract and conclusions and present them to you:

People dying in the tens of thousands, indeed, is a significant health issue. It is the whole and sole purpose of health agencies to stop people from dying by identifying threats to public health. Yet, health Australia is not doing it yet. What more evidence do they need?

In the introduction, Allen writes:

This paper features an analysis of factors associated with the recent experience of excess deaths, by individual state and territory in Australia as it relates to the official historical record of total booster vaccinations by State and Territory. It relates it to vaccine data obtained from Australian Government official health statistics.

This is based on the cold, hard facts of official numbers. There is no propaganda, no opinions, and no other shenanigans. Just numbers—official ones.

I spare you all the technical jargon and copy below what matters. Keep in mind, that scientific etiquette encourages scientists to use neutral and unemotive language. Despite this, the author brings across how relevant and extraordinary the results are:

The highest correlation is between excess deaths and booster vaccine doses with a value of 0.87.

Here is a summary of what that means for those who know little about correlation.

If | r | is between 0.85 and 1, there is a strong correlation. If | r | is between 0.5 and 0.85, there is a moderate correlation. If | r | is between 0.1 and 0.5, there is a weak correlation. If | r | is less than 0.1, there is no apparent correlation.

A strong correlation means that the chances of one factor (Booster Shots) causing another factor (Excess Death) are very high.

This is strongly supported by almost no correlation between unboosted people and excess death: Most revealing is the insignificant correlation of 0.5 between the unvaccinated and excess deaths.

The conclusion reads:

The results are quite striking and suggest the existence of a strong regression relationship with significant coefficients and an Adjusted R-squared of 71 percent. Simple cross - validation tests suggest that the regression results are robust, despite the very limited sample size available in this cross - sectional regression.

These results match those of a recent study by Allen (2023) on the OECD country experience of excess deaths

So, there we have it: “Quite striking results.” Further, this is the second study to find this. The first found a similar result for the OECD countries. This is not only happening in Australia. It happens in many other countries, making it even more plausible. That nothing is done about this is deeply concerning and very sinister. The worldwide refusal to address this can’t be explained by incompetence alone.

All the evidence is useless if the people in power deliberately ignore it and continue to push injections that very likely kill tens of thousands of people in Australia alone.

I say “deliberately” because any health agency has a duty to keep up to date with current research about health outcomes. They can’t hide behind “we didn’t know about it.” If they still push these deadly injections, it appears intentional.

But there is still a choice and the responsibility for the people to look after their own health. People can still refuse these injections if they come to the conclusion that the risk/benefit doesn’t add up. But they can’t make that choice if they don’t know all the facts and research. This makes mainstream media compliant with the death of innocent people because they still refuse to inform the Australian public about research that contradicts the official narrative of a “safe and effective” injection.

So it is up to us to fulfil this civil duty. I did my part. Sharing and restacking are yours, especially on social media and outside Substack. Please don’t give up on them. Share in the hope that it reaches some of them, and maybe you can save a life and keep a granddad or grandma around for a few more years to the benefit of their grandchildren and the community. Thank you.