Is Dr Malone "Captured Opposition" And Why It Does Not Matter

Let's become our own leaders in our own lives

I did not expect the overwhelming response to my recent angry rant Fuck you, Dr Malone. It totally surprised me.

Most writers have a hunch that a new article resonates with their readers after finishing it. I almost didn’t publish this one because my angry energy had evaporated the next day, and I didn’t think it was anything of great value. But then I thought: “I wrote it, I might as well publish it for what it is worth - just an angry rant.”

And then this still ongoing overwhelming response.

To put it in perspective, most of my articles attract less than 1000 lifetime views and less than 20 likes. I have a tiny readership. Although this article is only one week old, it has attracted over 10,000 views, more than 370 likes, and hundreds of comments, and people keep restacking it.

This seriously threatens my long-held belief that I am shadow-banned, or, more intriguingly, I ask myself: “Was the ban lifted for this specific article and why?”

But this, of course, could all be just paranoia talk, and I abstain from exploring this rabbit hole today.

Today, I want to explore the accusation that Dr. Malone is “captured opposition” from my point of view mainly using the very revealing podcast DocMalik did with Dr. Malone in January 2024.

DocMalik did a brilliant job of not reacting to the aggressive, top-down, arrogant attitude of Malon and, like a smiling assassin, let Malone dig his own reputational grave and show the world the nasty side of his character that enrages so many people, as often expressed in the comments. (Honestly, I would have told Malone to fuck off ten minutes into the conversation (which really was a Malone monologue) when he started to yell at DocMalik for the first time. Thankfully DocMalik didn’t.)

The overwhelmingly affirming“Fuck you, Dr. Malone” response tells me that there is a lot of anger and frustration out there about our leaders and the people we look up to. There is a real sense of betrayal and broken trust, bigger than Dr. Malone alone.

Through his own doing and self-blindness about his character, Malone is the current lightning rod on which the brewing frustrated collective anger discharges itself. He replaced Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates. I wonder if this is a practical demonstration of the saying: “The revolution eats its own children”. I never understood this phrase fully.

In the podcast, Malone insists that this is precisely how modern 5th-generation psychological warfare works. It divides the resistance movement by putting dissidents against each other. And people like me and many others who criticise are simply jealous and want to gain new subscribers by smearing the big ones.

His more admiring fans should also carefully listen to how he and Jill see and conduct his podcast: “As a business.” The reason for their success: “Working bloody hard and putting an extended essay out daily. (Often way too long and tedious for me, and sometimes half-written by AI. But that’s just me.)

That, according to Malone, is the reason for their success over other writers. Fair enough.

The way he expresses it, it seems that the admiring adoration of his fans is not reciprocated. The Malones don’t see their subscribers primarily as fellow freedom fighters, as a band of dissidents that will change the world for the better. No, they are “customer” of their “writing business”. That’s what Malone said himself in the podcast.

Maybe that partly explains why many people, primarily former admirers like myself, are angry with him now. Perhaps it was our own fault to see more in him than just the very knowledgeable and very connected guy who does know a lot.

But then again, he travelled the world from one freedom fighter conference to the next, positioning himself as the alpha freedom movement leader from day one. He didn’t say then that this was just part of growing his Substack business for his customers.

I am maybe a bit one-sided here because I believe that there is a rebel in him who wants to change things for the better, but, as the narcissist I see in him, he can’t emphasise how hurtful it might be for many of the fans that put so much hope in him to be treated like mere “customers” in their “writing business.” He then becomes puzzled about why people distrust him and get offended.

Once again, it is essential to emphasise that this is just how I see him based on my limited information. It is my personal opinion. I am not saying that’s how he is.

To give credit where credit is due, the man knows a lot of stuff, and many “important” people were right in the middle of all this. This makes his offerings relevant and interesting. And he reminds everybody about that constantly and annoyingly. I guess saying he is “bragging about it” would not be an exaggeration.

To me, that is no surprise and fits the psychopathic narcissist character that I see in his public appearances. Of course, no character trait defines all of a person. We all have multiple, often opposing, character strategies at our disposal. I am sure Robert has a very soft, humble side that is deeply hidden somewhere, and that comes out with his loved ones and maybe his animals. But it is the narcissistic side we see a lot in public.

And being “captured oppossition” is the most frequent accusation thrown at him.

I am no expert in this and, surprisingly, couldn’t find a meaningful “official” definition of the term on a quick superficial search. But to me, it has two forms—a conscious and unconscious form.

If Dr. Malone voluntarily and knowingly acts like a genuine dissident of the “freedom movement” while secretly and deliberately undermining and dividing this movement, it is the conscious form of it.

This might or might not be the case, and it is impossible to prove or disprove unless a whistle-blower leaks bullet-proof evidence. Maybe it is already out there, but I haven’t seen it. People infer his motivations from his behaviour and words, but that can be interpreted differently, for example, solely from his character and being morally corrupted by his new power status.

The unconscious form manifests itself when Dr. Malone is indeed the genuine “freedom fighter” he says he is, citing believable evidence of challenging the authorities and getting punished by them. As he says in the podcast, “I have the scars to prove it.” And it is true. He challenged the establishments at some point, and he got smeared a lot. No one can deny that.

He then accuses the other dissidents of being 5th generation Psyop warfare agents who try to divide the movement by attacking and criticising him. We also can’t dismiss this possibility, of course. It is not unthinkable.

But this is not the problem that divides the movement, in my opinion.

It is not the criticism and attacks that cause this division; it is how Dr Malone handles them and reacts to them: “Like an angry raging bull charging at every piece of red cloth stuck in his face.”

Other high-profile dissidents are a threat to the establishment and get smeared and criticised by fellow dissidents all the time who respond calmly and humbly without attacking and accusing others and turning into raging narcissistic bulls that can do no wrong.

The best example is Dr. Malon’s friend Mattias Desmet. Mattias is attacked, smeared, and harassed all the time by the establishment and “dissidents” alike. Coincidently, both share a main dissident attacker: The Breggins.

The difference in response tells us all about their different characters, wisdom and self-confidence. While Malone sued the Breggins for 20 Million Dollars for defamation, Desmet quietly wrote an open “reaching-out” and “bridge-building” Substack post to them offering constructive talks. This is a self-confident response; to sue is a selfish, child-like power-tantrum move.

I never read anything about whether the Breggins took up Desmet’s offer, publicly or privately. It might or might not have been resolved. But I know that the feud stopped there and then without further damaging or dividing the freedom movement.

In contrast, the court case against the Breggins divided the freedom movement like nothing else, judging by the many comments I got. That was suicidal for Malone and showed his true aggressive character to the world more than ever before.

But no matter what, he sees himself as this colossal victim everyone wants to destroy - which is at the very core of the narcissistic-psychopathic core belief of that character type and starts to lash out aggressively in the podcast against many people, sincerely believing that all he does is “defending himself.”

I noticed this behaviour years ago when he tried to handle trolls on his then-still-open Substack. I even made several comments at the time, trying to calm him down and ignore the trolling.

But anyway, he can’t help himself.

Knowing this, there might be brilliant Psychop people that “capture him” without his knowledge by simply poking the narcissist beast through some paid actors and then sitting back and watching him doing the dividing damage to the “freedom movement” all by himself.

They could play him masterfully, and the brilliant, stupid man doesn’t realise that he has become the most significant divisive force in the “freedom movement” through how he reacts.

Plus, as he reveals in the podcast, he takes steroids.

There is no way of knowing if he took some that day. Still, he certainly looked like a bit of a “roid rage”, offering one explanation for his overly aggressive and combative attitude and behaviour during the whole podcast.

I once took steroids myself, and I was blown away by what it did to me. I felt almost like a God, full of confidence and power, decades younger and, yes, aggressive without seeing it as that. I saw it as a god-given natural power that entitled me to express myself without caring one bit about how it affects anyone else.

It would be best if you looked at that glowing, excessively confident, combative face and attitude to understand what I mean. Steroids could play a role here, no doubt.

It is like we look at a different man than the calm, measured, rational person during the famous Rogan podcast. But that was before the fame, of course, and before “everyone tried to get to him.”

If you are going very deep into the surveillance, 5th generation psycho warfare rabbit hole, as he does, a certain amount of paranoia would also be your constant companion.

So, no wonder he, consciously or unconsciously, is the perfect lighting rod for the “freedom movement”, hugely divisive, and maybe this was deliberately set up that way. By constantly warning us and showing us how this psych-op works, he might have overlooked how they unleash at him. That is just one possibility, of course.

But all of this doesn’t matter.

I don’t think it matters much if the “freedom movement” gets divided, and I often divide it myself by calling out leaders I deem hypocritical. It can’t be helped. Movements driven by egos always get divided because personalities soon become more important than the cause.

And make no mistake - this is not only the fault of the personalities. It is mainly the fault of the mindless, lazy fanboys and fangirls who thirst for a leader to do all the thinking and acting for them and put them on a pedestal. The “adoring” types can “see no wrong” in their new-found idol. You find them in the comment sections of every leader-type writer. They create the God complex, especially in the narcissistic personality that is drawn to “lead” people like flies are drawn to shit.

Let’s talk briefly about the nature of “movements” in that context.

This is a bit off-topic, but I dislike and distrust all deliberate, named movements with allocated leaders. Based on history, I believe they all get corrupted by the power they gain. In the power-greed paradigm, they, over time, replace the old rulers with new ones.

But I don’t want to be ruled by anyone - full stop. Why would I?

I believe in a future paradigm of leaderless, spontaneous grassroots movement of like-minded people who feel the same about an issue. They are aware of and done with all the power-greed bullshit around them and start to act accordingly in their everyday life.

Not as part of a new ideology or any movement that has captured them but through spontaneous acting based on their insights, life experiences and wisdom, no matter if they are alone or if a million think like them.

Never trust a man or woman who joins a movement. All they are after is either security, power or money.

Either be your movement or fuck off.

That doesn’t mean you can’t connect with others as equals, exchange notes, and learn from others.

All movements, in my opinion, including the religious or spiritual ones, are dangerous and lead to some abuse of power.

That’s why I always immediately dismiss the spirituality of people who say, “I am a Christian” or “I am a Muslim” as fake.

Finding God is the most intimate, spontaneous, individual pursuit there is. We can’t find God better by joining a like-minded herd.

Instead of finding our personal God experience, we believe in some God indoctrination and make ourselves believe that this is spirituality. It is simply a mental exercise that makes us feel better and more secure for a while.

Deep spiritual individual search, initially instructed and supported by a teacher we trust, will ultimately shred our false personality to pieces, obliterate all false worldly security from any group or religious ideology, and rebirth us in God’s image. Only then do we “know” God intimately. Believing is not knowing.

This is not the intellectual knowing of something done by the mind. The mind will never know God. It is the opposite. God can't be present as long as there is a personal mind. The total absence of a personal mind will reveal God.

We can only know God by being one with Him.

Only then do we know our true selves as inseparable from God. Only then do we know what spirituality really means: The complete absence of Ego.

Until then, everything is a mental egoic mind game, including the mind game of being spiritual. It might be needed and unavoidable, but only the full realization of our ego nature can free us.

But back to movements.

This doesn’t mean there are no powerful movements that change our culture for the better or worse.

But I feel that only the yet unnamed, spontaneous grassroots movements are real, organic and not manipulated by power and greed and change culture for the better.

What does better mean?

For the common good. It is a collective automatic subconscious process that has been operating for millennia.

As soon as a small number of people “take charge”, rent a community hall, put chairs in a circle and start to try to deliberately “improve” society, we enter the space of the power-greed paradigm because, while often well-intentioned, all these people are unaware of their fundamental ignorance as ego entities. From the priests to the Imans to the “Caring Karens” and countless school boards and committees, it will never and can never be genuinely for the common good.

It will always be a small group of people that seek some advantage or power or fool themselves into being altruistic and “caring” for other people. “Caring for people” has been used for millennia as an excuse for religious, medical, and psychological abuse.

Care as much as you want - one on one. There is no shortage of people in need of help in your street or community. We don’t have to be clever and ideological about it. Instead of coming around with a Bible, how about a cooked meal? Or a listening ear? Or a smile?

I know this is a seemingly extreme position, and society is doing the opposite of what I suggest - all the time. Everyone feels entitled to intervene in everyone else’s business and tell people what to do or not do. Half of the population wants to lead the other half.

I think that is one of the main reasons why our societies and the planet is in such a fucking mess:

Ego’s fucking each other over all the time and not even realizing it.

As soon as a movement “gets organised” by some “leaders” and structures, dogmas, and meetings are implemented, we re-enter the power-greed paradigm through the backdoor.

I believe in individuals becoming their own leaders and acting accordingly.

Together, we then act like a leaderless school of fish in action, evading the sharks by staying united and responding through decentralized unconscious communication. This is so much more effective and faster than any hierarchical top-down leadership ever can, as demonstrated in this fantastic video:

No top-down leadership, no AI, will ever be able to replicate the mind-blowing, lighting-fast synchronicity these leaderless fish perform.

What is their secret?

Instead of constantly contracting their consciousness on “Me, myself and I”, the Ego, they expand their consciousness to their direct and immediate environment and tune into their neighbours, enabling these fantastic chain reactions.

Many people still feel robbed, lied to and increasingly disgusted by institutions and individual influencers and leaders worldwide who see us as a “stupid cohort” or “hackable animals” at their disposal to exploit us for political, ideological or financial purposes.

Is Dr. Malone one of them? Is he captured opposition in one way or another?

I say: “Who gives a fuck. It doesn’t matter. If it is not him, there will be another. If we cut him down, another one will take his place.”

These “leaders” can only affect us if we let them. Stop letting them.

It always comes back to the same again: The Art Of Non-Participation.

This means disattaching our minds from worldly experiences we desire so much and get attached to.

We can’t and shouldn’t stop experiences from happening. This is life happening.

But, we can go within as often as we remember to find and reside in that still place of pure awareness that sees all these experiences come and go without affecting that space at all—the peace of residing in our true Self.

Let’s all find our true selves first, and all blessings for ourselves and the world will follow automatically. This isn’t a passive state of non-acting. It is acting from a wise and peaceful place. But often, the wisest action is not acting at all.

A big thank you to all those new and old paying subscribers - your support keeps this going for all of us as long as it is needed. If you enjoyed these offerings for a while please support it with a paid subscription. Even one month, only $8, helps. And a year is only $30. (Remember to unsubscribe as it rolls over automatically)