Did Bill Just Gave Greta The Boot?

Is it time to dump the useful idiots and cash-in?

Speaking at a live event at The Times Center in New York, the billionaire Bill Gates argued for a pragmatic, technology-driven approach to global warming, which resulted in several headlines.

This sudden, un-escalating language regarding the climate fear-porn that rained down on us from all mass media channels over the past months and years feels somewhat blunt and surprising.

MSM and Substack are surprisingly quiet on it. Maybe everyone is slightly shocked and confused and tries to understand it. Here is my take on it, and I am curious how this resonates with other critical thinkers and dissidents.

Oh, so is it now, Mr. Gates? After years of climate panic and horror scenarios played out in all mass media?

I wonder how UN Boss Mr Guterres feels reading this. He ramped up the panic a few notches a few months ago by officially declaring that “global boiling” had arrived. And mainstream mass media doggedly distributed the “boiling mantra” to their dwindling flock of believers.

Mr Gates pours an ice-cold bucket of water on the burning coals. Did he backstab the whole net-zero camp in one short speech? It took decades of hard work and worldwide negotiations to get countries to sign up for CO2 emission reduction. Did Kill Bill just kill it all?

If you think Bill Gates is a good-hearted philanthropist who tries his best but is often misunderstood and unfairly criticized, I admire your love and trust in the good of people. But maybe you should stop reading now. I don’t want to break your heart. Mine is already broken, and waking up to the full extent of today’s corrupted, cynical world hurts.

If you don’t trust Bill but admire his intellect and what he achieved, and if you think he should be part of the solution, you have no idea what it means to make a pact with the devil. Read Goethe’s Faust.

If you make it from a high-school dropout fiddling with computers in your parent’s garage to the wealthiest and most powerful man in the world within half a lifespan - you have an edge the vast majority of people don’t have. And I don’t mean that as a compliment. Don’t underestimate Kill Bill.

Just because he is socially awkward and has the charisma of a traffic island doesn’t mean he is stupid. You don’t become so extremely influential by being foolish or being lucky. Everything this man does or says is part of executing another master plan.

The same goes for Elon Musk, by the way. I know you all long for a powerful superhero that saves us all. I hope one will come, but I don’t know what he/she looks like. But one thing is sure: It won’t be a bloody billionaire. (Unless he/she was struck by god’s wisdom or an intentional life-changing psychedelic kick up the arse.)

You don’t become a powerful billionaire just sitting there and waiting for opportunities. You constantly create opportunities yourself. You can buy the best minds and technology to advise you. He is way ahead of us.

Our only power is exposing his secret selfish intentions to the world. All odds are against us because he can buy all the public goodwill and political and bureaucratic favours he needs. But surrendering is not an option. So we do what we can and hope and sow tiny seeds that will become mighty trees of awareness guiding the naive and scared people of the world.

So what and why is he doing what he does right now? To me, it is obvious. The same game plan was successfully executed during the so-called COVID-19 pandemic. It is all there, and we can apply it directly to the Climate Crisis.

How the billionaires played the Covid Crisis

Phase One: Create a panic that eventually seeks a political solution, which the billionaires provide and cash in on.

Create a frightening global event that can’t be objectively and individually assessed on its truthfulness. Therefore, the truth about it is in the hands of experts (scientists), which in turn are in the hands of Bill Gates because he is the hand that feeds them through research grants and other means.

A deadly, highly infectious virus is infecting the whole world. The stories of how many are infected and how bad it is are all manipulated (through ramped-up tests and over-the-top testing.) The narrative is tightly controlled to support the desired outcome: There are many, and it is terrible. The world panics and looks for quick-fix solutions to avert the “crisis”.

Phase two: They are softening the populations with harsh and cruel over-the-top solutions (e.g. extended unnecessary lock-downs, useless mask-wearing, social isolations, preventing people from work, etc.) After a good, solid softening, the populations will willingly embrace any technical solutions (e.g., vaccines).

Phase Three: They eliminate all free, cheap and natural competitive solutions.

The billionaires’ most significant threat to any pandemic is to do nothing and let herd immunity solve it as it has for millions of years. A considerable threat was also re-purposed cheap drugs that were available and worked. So what did they do? They first rubbished and vilified the available life-saving drugs (Ivermectin, etc.). Then, they changed the definition of herd immunity behind our backs.

This excerpt is from my article “The Genocidal Potential Of Australia’s New Booster Policies” from March this year:

Before Nov 2021 the WHO definition of herd immunity reads

indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. (emphasis mine)

Most of the viral outbreaks of the last 150 years worldwide [Sars, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Ebola, etc.] disappeared without human interference. This is natural herd immunity at work. No vaccines were needed. The casualties on day 600 (almost two years after the outbreak) are listed at the right hand in this graph:

These pandemics all flattened out naturally after 200 to 400 days. Combined, they had just over 400,000 casualties. They go back more than fifty years, so we lost less than 8,000 people annually on average to pandemics worldwide. And yet, Bill Gates founded CEPI and spent billions and scared us senselessly, stating that we are unprepared for pandemics. If he wanted to save lives, wouldn’t tackling malnutrition much better value for the dollar? According to WHO, 2.362 Billion people suffered from a form of malnutrition worldwide in 2020 alone. 8000 that maybe could have been saved with vaccines vs. 2.362 Billion? It makes me wonder.

“But the big one. You didn’t count the big one, the Spanish flu.” some might say.

The Spanish Flu killed approximately Fifty million people, but there are doubts it was all due to the virus alone. WW I and the general poor living conditions of the masses at the time probably made it much worse than it would be today.

And then we have this highly plausible theory by

bad cattitude

that the high casualties of the Spanish Flu were iatrogenic - overdosing massively with the new wonder drug Aspirin. It is all laid out in this fascinating article, “The greatest lie told during Covid”. So, what is the biggest lie that rules them all?

Pandemics are dangerous to modern societies.

The biggest lie that rules them all

Therefore, this lie had to be indoctrinated, and herd immunity, the simply free solution, had to be eliminated.

In Nov 2021 “previous infection”, meaning natural immunity, was omitted from the WHO definition. It now says that herd immunity:

is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.

By omitting a few words from a definition by an unelected body not accountable to the people of the planet, another unelected body (CEPI) finds the justification to vaccinate a global population endlessly until herd immunity is achieved. As shown with the flu, some viruses can not be eradicated, so herd immunity will never be achieved. Covid-19 is one of them.

We probably can count the unelected appointed decision makers at WHO and CEPI on two hands. Less than ten people decided the vaccination destiny of 8 billion people. And what kept our species alive for millions of years - natural immunity - is simply erased to justify the global vaccination of every citizen. And our elected politicians just rolled over and accept this without a fight.

COVID-19 will stay here forever, and with it, an endlessly producing cash cow called a vaccination program. WHO lied to us. Vaccinations don’t build herd immunity. They create herd dependency and endless profits for billionaires.

Which brings us to Phase 4.

Let’s recap.

First, the panic is created. Then, people are softened up with almost unbearable COVID restrictions. Then natural, cheap or free solutions are deliberately eliminated. Finally, the billionaires offer very profitable technological solutions.

Phase four

Only the elites can offer a quick-fix, highly complicated, sophisticated, technical solution. Politicians, if not already corrupted and part of the scheme, are put under massive pressure by the artificially induced fear and the population's suffering. They willingly give in to “the technical solutions” and pay for it with taxpayers money.

That’s how 5 trillion dollars got moved up to the billionaires. On top of that, they got “funded” to develop and mass-test the new highly profitable mRNA technology on us.

Same script, same cast for the climate crisis

Phase 1: Create a global crisis announced by "scientific experts” that individuals can’t verify individually: Global warming. Tick.

Global warming, solely based on theories and computer modelling, is tightly controlled by a tiny group of experts (scientists), which are owned by the hands that feed them. Individuals have no means of individually proving or disproving these claims.

The few independent scientists who have the means and do not agree are marginalized and ridiculed as “climate deniers”. Any debate is stifled. The future climate disaster is described as horrible and irreversible. A few cold facts we still have access to, like “Climate disasters decreased by 10% since 2000”, are not reaching the masses outside the Substack network. The world panics and looks for quick-fix solutions

Phase two: The population is softened up and bombarded with fear-porn of “global boiling” and other catastrophic, irreversible events and more and more financial, practical and social restrictive measures are implemented worldwide (e.g. ESG score, fifteen-minute-cities, carbon footprint scores, etc.) to make people suffer more or threatens to create more suffering in the future.

That’s where Gates's latest speech comes in. It starts with Phase Two (threat to make our lives harder), moves swiftly to Phase Three (eliminating the free competition) and finally offers Phase 4 (expensive technological solutions only the billionaires can provide to “save” the masses from the suffering of climate change.)

No one on this planet experienced any additional natural disaster so far. All these wildfires, floods, and storms were in the normal range. The climate panic is all in our heads, artificially created and systematically abused.

A recent spike of unseasonal 30C heat in September in Sydney happened five times over the past 150 years or so, and the highest was in 1895, as proven in The Big Boil Is Coming. We all need one of these:

I am not saying we don’t need to watch the climate and increase our efforts to curb pollution and toxic emissions as much as we can sustainably. We have to look after our environment. But panicking about it and getting taken to the cleaners by billionaires over it is just stupid.

In that context, I offer you Bill Gates's latest speech:

“If you try to do climate things brute force, you’ll sometimes get people say, ‘Hey, I like climate, I’m for climate, but I don’t want to bear that cost and reduce my standard of living.’

Clever Bill. It starts with an open threat to soften up people: “Brute force.” Where does that come from? Many fear-mongering and restrictive suggestions have been circulated, but no one has announced “brute force” to tackle climate change.

But it is announced now by one Bill Gates. Is it a veiled threat? You decide. In the same sentence, however, he distances himself from it. He doesn’t like to be seen as a totalitarian climate tyrant. He simply wants to make money.

He is and always has been a businessman. Why would he suddenly be interested in saving the world? All he did was change his title (Philanthropist) and move his money to a trust he still controls.

And he is sly. He seemingly emphasizes with people regarding the net zero costs. As you can see at the end of this article, his proposed high-tech solutions will cost many billions, and the taxpayer always pays for it. Could net zero mainly benefit other billionaires, especially Elon Musk (Tesla is the world leader in power storage units urgently required for over-supply of green energy)? Is he missing out?

So, he has no problem with backstabbing all the useful net zero climate idiots he has used so far to wind up the population.

Net zero alone doesn’t maximize his profits. Net zero is a little bit like natural “herd immunity”. Everyone backs off a little and uses a bit more green technology, and together with planting trees, it will stabilize the climate. It won’t harm, that’s for sure.

It's not good enough, not fast enough for Gates, though.

The political realities are such that without innovation, it’s unlikely, particularly in middle-income countries, that the brute force approach will be successful.

Usually, the people of a country collectively create the political reality of what they want. But Gates knows better and has already decided that only “innovations” will solve a problem that has not yet manifested. So far, the only climate problem we have is in the papers and our heads. Look outside. Where is the climate problem?

We all know now that there wasn’t a Covid problem for most people. It was only in the papers and our heads.

I’m the person who’s doing the most on climate in terms of the innovation and how we can square multiple goals.

He positions himself, like with Covid, once again, as the worldwide expert regarding climate change. He also promises solutions for the suffering people: His innovations. He positions himself as “the saviour” of the people from some “brute force” that is about to happen to enforce net zero.

He says: “Buy my innovations, political leaders of the world, and I release your people from the climate fear”, which has no actual basis and he helped to create.

This is all Phase 4 stuff. - sell my product.

So far, some Gates fans and climate panic believers can still find angles to defend Gates, hail him as a saviour of the climate, and are willing to pay him for it. But I wonder how they deal with his next brutal attack on his biggest competition: Nature. This shows his true face and deeper motivations:

I don’t use some of the less proven approaches.” Moderator: “Such as.” “I don’t plant trees. “There’s a lot of people who are very enamored with trees. We’ve got trees on this stage. Some people would even say that if you just planted enough trees, it could take care of the climate issue altogether.” “And that’s complete nonsense.” “OK.” “I mean, are we the science people or are we the idiots? Which one do we want to be?”

Textbook Phase Three: Eliminate cheap and free competition. Trees are not good for selling my innovations. Let’s discredit and rubbish them.

If that statement doesn’t finish him off, the global population has gone irreversibly stupid once and forever.

If there is one proven approach to keeping the world’s climate in balance, it is trees. Gates's statement is so grotesque and alienated that I wonder if he has finally lost his marbles and has entirely morphed into a transhuman technocratic grandiose god-like illusion of himself.

I am sure this will spawn a lot of “scientific” debate about how much CO2 trees absorb, and I am sure Bill Gates has already put everything in place to “control” the new “trees are not needed anymore for a balanced climate” narrative. There will be enough corrupt “scientists” undermining or openly denying that trees have a significant role in the planet’s climate. Studies that “discredit” trees will be financed and published. Studies that show the benefits of trees will be rubbished.

Trees are the new Ivermectin.

Gates started it by indirectly saying: “If you call yourself a scientist and believe trees are beneficial for the climate, you are an idiot.” It couldn’t be clearer.

If you are a scientist and challenge me now to prove that trees are beneficial, I won’t. I simply will be rude and say: “Fuck off” and I will feel sorry for you. And I will go all esoteric on you and ask you: “When was the last time you walked through a forest?” Never? I thought so. God help us with extremely alienated scientists ruling the world.

Innovations

So what are Bill Gates's new technologies that will save us from the terrible climate change still to come? I am sure we hear all about them very soon. Here are some.

The first one goes back to 2010, but the fear level wasn’t at a fever pitch then, and he couldn’t sell it to the world then.

Silver Lining

This is a long and detailed article about this project. It encompasses a massive fleet of ships that pumps water into the sky to create white clouds reflecting the sun's rays to combat warming. Why do it the simple way (reduce CO2, plant trees that reduce CO2) when we can do it in a costly, complicated way?

Simple doesn’t make billionaires as rich, I suppose.

And what can go wrong? Ah, not much. It might upset the local weather and climate a little. So, they are changing the local climate to stop global climate change. That is too smart for me. But I am not a scientist. Gates says it himself:

“OK.” “I mean, are we the science people or are we the idiots? Which one do we want to be?”

This project was eventually shelved, but it might be resurrected. Watch this space.

Another recent project works with the same idea but is even more complicated and expensive. It involves releasing colourless Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) gas into the earth’s stratosphere. This long technical article is a true eye-opener of what mad scientists want to do next, funded by Bill Gates.

Similar logic to above: Impending climate change might cause unusual draughts jeopardizing future crops. Let’s fight that with multi-billion projects that threaten rain and crops. I mean, are we the science people, or are we the idiots? Which ones do we want to be? I think we just got the answer to that.

I have to ask again. What can go wrong with interfering massively with our climate?

Gates says:

“I don’t use some of the less proven approaches.”

Referring to trees. According to Gates, the benefits of trees to the planet and the climate are less proven than his technical “innovations.” Could that be called a “God complex”? Or, more accurately, a “Satan complex.”

It looks like Greta made a Faustian pact with the devils of this world, and she is paying for it now. I think she is not needed anymore. Mission “Climate Panic” accomplished. Tree huggers and carbon savers go home.

Billionaires need the carbon to sell “innovations.”

Billionaires need a warmer climate. How else can they sell solutions?

If you are informed and entertained by my articles and can afford it, please consider supporting my hard work and becoming a paying subscriber, even only for one month. It is only A$5 and only A$30 per year. Much less if you pay in $US or Euro. Thank you.